Yes, I cannot remember. I didn't exactly count; but it remains a very valid point. As for the other stuff, you're clinging on to things.



The Owen decision happened on 55 mins. By no means a gamebreaker; there is no certainty that Cas would still have lost had it gone in your favour.



As for the win, I am accepting it and I have no problem aside from pointing out that like fans of both sides, myself included, some fans are biased towards their own side and completely negate anything that went in favour of their side. It's you lot that are bleating about injustices, how McGoldrick should be punished and wanting support on a Cas forum.

Too true! Poor defence on our part cost us victory in a hard-fought (if not overly skillful) game - congratulations to both sets of players (And fans) for providing a classic derby match which I for one enjoyed even though we were robbed, I mean lost.

Feck me what a thread. I'm really puzzled as to why I bother with these forums any more. Some of the arguments some people make are an absolute embarrassment to the human race.

Try reading the post above the one you've replied to.



Cas have been on the receiving end of a number of calls this season where the ball has been called as having gone back, despite the opposition player facing their opponents posts, and despite the ball not being ripped out. If the ball is ripped out when facing the opponents posts, it will only go backwards if you think about it. Either way, at least we've finally seen some consistency on this particular interpretation and got the call in our favour.

That expensive state education you have had seems to have let you down in the reading department love, it was you that said you had 4 tries disallowed, I merely pointed out that the technology proved you wrong or do you want to split hairs on that one as well, and that same technology also proved that Wakefield were hard done by on 2 occasions which resulted in 2 tries for you, and was simply a response to you and your post trying to make your win that much bigger when in fact is wasn't, all I am guilty of is offering an alternative to your version of events, and IF YOU READ MY RESPONSE I conceded that Cas were the better team on the day and deserved their win, if I might just make a suggestion here why don't you read what is written before jumping in with both feet half cocked with your hair brained thoughts' hth.

I'm quite sure you have been on the receiving end of some bad decisions' all season as we have and I've no doubt every other club has, I have already pointed out to you that there is no such thing as perfect officials' and I'd bet there has never been a game played where they got it right every time, fwiw I do not have a problem with any decision the ref made on Saturday, he called things how he saw it end of, I simply offered you an alternative opinion.

So you said before that you can't see the point of my argument, whilst having a moan about a knock-on that wasn't given. You now say you don't have any problem with any decision made in the game. Why contradict yourself purely for the sake of offering 'an alternative opinion?' Is your backside not hurting yet from sitting on that fence?

you do not have an argument or even a valid point to make, just an assumption that on the basis the official did not see him rife the ball out it's not a knock on. As well you know I was not moaning about it either, just offering fully an alternative outlook on the game but don't let that stop you from a bit of selective misquoting as with the reference to my thoughts' on the referee I doubt you would be happy with some of the decisions that went against us had the situation been reversed, but the point I was trying to get across to you unsuccessful as it was that these things happen in the game and the best thing to do is accept them and move on which you clearly have not, I do hope I have put my point across to you without contradicting myself too much, but I'm sure there will be some thing in there for you to turn into another pointless post.

Keep going Bonzo.



You will wear him down to the point where he tells you (again

) how he got his name.

And as I have repeatedly said - if you READ too - 3/4 - I could not remember. Usually, I could not remember indicates that I was taking a stab in the dark not stating the correct figure. Technology did not prove me wrong as I said the Owen decision was incorrect and nor have I argued that our tries should have been given. You're arguing about things that haven't even been disputed or raised?!



As for making the win that much bigger - what the hell? I have never said it should have been; I said it COULD have been much bigger. QED.

Keep it up with Bonzo, Fully





He'll be back shortly. The Van will be parked up for the night.

I'm waiting for his compadre to arrive.