....have just returned from the game and don't know wether to laugh or cry, especially at the refs performace. I'm not saying that the ref has made us lose today because I think we were'nt that far from winning, we just needed a bit of luck. Danny, Rob and Ali all made good breaks that I believe if our confidence was higher and we'd had some luck we could have easily converted those into points. The interception did'nt either. We're not quite at the races yet, and I'm sure it will come soon, I don't want to be playing our best footy now, we can leave that until the summer.



But I would like to comment on the ref, I though he was totally out of depth and was not fair for either side, we lost the penalty count 17-7, but it's not the number of penalties that bother me (well it does a little) it's where they are on the field and if they are back to back. Wakefield had 2 back to back and scored from both, that's just bad discipline. 80m bad discipline. But he did'nt control the ruck and seemed to ping us very quickley, the one against Buderus near the end was possiblely the quickest PTB of the game. It was laughable I'd just like to see more consistancy, by treating both sides the same. There was only 1 penalty in the game for not standing square, something he chose not to police for 65 mins, then he pulled us for offside under our own posts twice in 3 sets, Brough kicked the last one. At various times at the end of the first half when we were attacking and could have scored, not 1 defender had any foot behind the line, never mind 2 feet, again something he chose not to police. My point is, to give your opponants 17 more sets in a game will make the game very hard to win, but I think not all were warrented, he did'nt penalise both sides for the same offence. He seemd to pick and chose, this is what Sinfield was pointing out and Peacock was too in the first half, he pointed to the place where Rob B. was tackled and held down by Brough in the first half, probably saving 6 points and could have been sin binned. If we don't get treated the same as other sides we are going to be on the end of some big penalty counts and will struggle to make if 4 in a row. Certain Leeds players need to get off the tackled man very quickly......or else.

Is the post game thread not good enough for you?

And yet strangely the Yorkshire Radio commentators who have a distinct Leeds agenda, were both of the opinion that the referee had a good game and it was Leeds who were the architect of their gross penalty count ?

some were our own stupidity, but others not, that's why some players were questioning the ref. It was all a little too fast for him.

Start a petition why don't you

Just a bit aye.

I didnt need reminding that Donalds try was fantastic for 5 minutes.

Thing is, people complained that players were allowed to lay on too long last year. Now the refs are sorting it and trying to get back to quick PTB's people are complaining about that now. Theres just no pleasing some folk.

Ill sign it

We were in every aspect Mc F ball control,discipline and intensity but i also think the OP is correct in pointing out that we didn't receive the same penalties for the same offences that let us down.

Just to add i thought Wakey were the better side and punished our mistakes and we didn't get going imo until Sinny was sin-binned.

The not standing square was worse mate and the same "tackle time" wasn't enforced for both teams but like i said above we deserved to lose.

We probably did deserve to lose, but were Wakefield really that quick off the ball carrier, it just seemed they were allowed a little more latitude.

That Leeds were consistently pinged for holding down but nothing was given for the professional foul on Burrow in the 1st half speaks volumes.