He should do.

A complaint should also be made about Wane and Tomkins

If he appeals though he could face two matches and when you read what the board said its something along lines of "contact with the head = ban". Can't see them budging on that.



Also tomkins expressed an opinion on twitter not a criticism as far as i have seen so can't see a complaint standing. Likewise wane stated an opinion as well as mcdermott so in the grand theme of things can't see there being a big fuss.

Wouldn't stoop to that. Answer them on the pitch and the scoreboard.



And if that doesn't work then a nice air-clearing dust-up in the 80th minute should give Red Hall the opportunity to be "consistent" before the Grand Final.

Was thinking exactly the same myself. If after 60-65 minutes we're clearly out of the game it is up to the likes of Bailey to target some of their more influential players with a bit of rough stuff and verbals. I'd also like some of our other lads to develop a nasty edge for games like this. It's all got a little bit cosy between some of our lads and opposition players for my liking. I would like to see Ratboys face rearranged if we're defo crashing out, by fair means or foul. Like you say, let's give the judiciary chance to show their "consistency".

Thing is our winger is 6ft (Saint Pat .... Sir to you) ..... I really don't think its Bailey style to pick on anything other than 5ft wingers or scrum halves. Goodnight cupcake

This has gone a bit too far.

Wow there are some pretty low suggestions on here. You want your players to develop a "nasty edge" if the game runs away from you?



Sorry but that's just ridiculous and completely uncalled for. Just remember how easy it is for players to be seriously hurt in fair play let alone foul.



Your an embarrassment to your club and im pretty sure if your players were shown these comments they would agree. Or at least id hope so.

completely agree, absolutely out of order comments on here.