which facebook site is it on?

Someone posted it on my wall earlier and it looks even more evident as it's zoomed in. Surprised if it gets a mention though.

I feel like Hardaker was a little annoyed as he felt Connor was offside and expected a penalty, when that didn't come and Connor was sill at him Hardaker lashed out a little. That's how I saw it. Hardakers previous is colouring people's view of him these days and I don't think he can complain about that. Sent home from the England squad, 'involved' in an assault, banned for unacceptable language etc. It just makes people jump to conclusions whenever he does the slightest thing now and he'll have to deal with that.

Well you would as he plays for Leeds. So that's it then, it didn't happen as he's got a previous record for being a bit of a pest? I presume Simms didn't drop his forearm on Sinfield's face last week either?

jake shouldn't have got involved with the niggling, but as for a bite?? i have watched it back and not seen anything to suggest he has been bitten.



if... if he has then connor should face a few games sat at home, it would be interesting to see what the MRP thinks about it on monday.

if there is no bite there then maybe it's just trying to hide the fact that hardaker was lucky not to concede a penalty for striking..saying that though connor should have walked away and not let the niggle get to him.

bit.ly/1c42p7o brough saying there player was biten not zak having a laugh

bit.ly/1c42p7o brough saying there player was biten not zak having a laugh

Brilliant, Brough trying to turn tables after Conner is called out on social media. Pathetic from the Gaints. Should be funny to see what comes out of this. Gaints fans have already said there was no bite in the incident (in their opinion). Let's see if they do a massive 180.

and we have all said that if there was a bite then jake should be looking at a long ban, but there simply isn't enough evidence out there, on still or moving pictures to conclusively show there was a bite.



obviously the MRP will have different camera angles etc to be able to make that decision.

After Jake is called out on social media? What a thread on rlfans



I doubt very much the "giants" are bothered about unsubstantiated claims from fans on here.

As I've already said if jake bit someone, he should be banned. The panel will look at it and make a decision regardless of what anyone on "social media" thinks.

Looking very "tasty" when the Giants and Brough come to HQ soon

why not? social media got lipreaders brought in and hardaker investigated despite no evidence whatsoever

100% right and Conner blatantly does something to Zak that fires him up. If you take the time to look at 79:20 on the sky clock Conner (to my eyes) bites Hardaker.



The Brough story is some poor attempt at a cover up.