My previous post was to some extent tongue in cheek.



With how bad Hull were I can't see from that game why you'd make the conclusion that they 'WILL win the Grand Final'.



Only if everyone plays as bad as Hull did could that be certain.



Hull probably only had about a third of the ball....tackled way too much....played at the wrong end of the field and their confidence was shot. Apart from their FB and Whiting everyone else had stinkers. They were easy pickings.



Share the ball and field position and don't let Wigan build early momentum and Wigan are more than beatable.

I agree with most, apart from the last sentence. Smith controlled the game, wigan played the conditions and deserved to win a dull game.



I don't think that means they'll win the GF, but at least they are prepared to play a big final in the rain, unlike a certain other Lancashire team

They've clearly got more to give and may do well so in the play offs. Having said that, I'd be delighted if we meet them and they play no better than Saturday. The other big unknown is how they'll respond after their cup win. In recent years cup winners have tended to perform worse once they've got that trophy in the bag.

Super Sam is tweeting they are still hungover

Leaving do's can be milked it seems.

Hull were hungover during the game.

The way Holdsworths 'hand-to-eye-to-ball' co-ordination held up during the game, one could presume he was ed-during duty.

I believe Leeds have had quite a few Challenge Cup hangovers in the past few years.

I thank god I didn't put any money on him, after a Hull fan tipped him as MoM.

You've quoted me out of context mush.I was only quoting a tweet I saw from S Tomkins.If you take a look back further you will see I defended you on here when someone called you something

I know you did fella hence the

No prob and once again well played