Soliaola and Gidley were your first choice centres, look at your squad numbers.



How your t.v. seat?



The op asked, Who Else, did he not (I thought you taught English), I actually replied to HIS post.

Wello

gardner

gidley

wheeler

meli

pryce

eastmond

graham

KC

tony p

flannery

sia

wilkin



Roby

maurie

bryn

clough



That IMO would have been our starting 17.

Sqweaky bottom time brian?

Soliola was brought over as centre/second row, much as Gilmour was last year as those are the positions he has played in. HOwever, we lost Solioloa by halftime of the first match of the season and Wheeler became default first choice. When he has been injured it has been Flannery covering. We were getting down to desperation stakes at one point when Gidley was injured as well as Wheeler, so Armstrong had to come in on the wing and Foster played at centre, and had a mare, although we haven't seen Armstrong since then either I don't think. However, this time we've put Meli at centre with Flannery at the other centre, but of course Meli plays on the wing and Flannery is a second rower.



We've really lost track of who is first choice and who is second choice to be honest as during Potter's time here we have had so many injuries that with the exception of the prop forwards it hasn't really been a case of one man dominating one position for the best part of two seasons. These days I'm beginning to think of Foster and Lomax as our first choice wingers as both Meli and Gardner have been missing for two or three spells each.

Please explain.

I was replying to the o.p. who asked who else?





And explained.

At least I thought I did.

To reasonable people of course.

It's not just a case of who was missing, but how well certain players have done playing out of postion.

Just last week we put cricket score on the wildcats, you said we can only beat whats infront of us and the wildcats are poor.



This week we go to a team that turned you over at your place with a team missing some good players, not one centre on the pitch, a hooker playing at 7 and few young kids, yet you still feel the need to put saints down.

Well I hope if we meet you in the play offs or GF that Lomax and Foster are your "first choice wingers"

Just out of curiosity how many games on the wing have Lomax and Foster played v Meli and Gardner?

Spot on. However, Rogues just wants to get in how Wigan have had six million players missing this year but have had no credit for it and so why are Saints talking about missing players. Coz the poor ole crusties have had a much, much harder time and hey, look, they're top.



Except, of course, they haven't had 11 players out at the same time at any time, meaning that they are down to playing an 18 year old scrum half on his debut with wingers playing as centres and second rowers playing as props and centres and wingers.

Foster was a winger when we beat you at DW. He saved the bloody match for us, idiot. So that would be fine by me.

I do have to applaud how well a saints team plays together no matter what position or combination of 17. You have a knack of just making things stick and work out. Like tonight, whenever a saints player threw the ball to ground, another saints player picked up for them, yet whenever we threw the ball to the floor, a saints player dropped on it first.

Lomax has missed most of the season.



Ade has missed alot of the season.



Foster not played all that much really.



We've had a few wingers this year, meli, ade, foster, lomax, armstrong and dean all played wing this year.