Well that is certainly much better put!



Its an interesting idea and it isn't as outlandish as the OP first made out to be.



Just how viable could/would it be though?

It is a fairly obvious question. Especially considering the fairly saturated market they are operating in. They have to be clear they are making more as a whole rather than just giving help to their competitors.

The only Championship Clubs directly in competition for fans and sponsorship are Batley and Dewsbury, the rest are far enough apart for it not to be an issue, SL clubs on the other hand are generally competing against each other much more off pitch as well as on

Id think the net is much wider, certainly for sponsorship, there arent many companies who can support sponsorship of a championship side who would operate in Leigh but not swinton, Batley but not featherstone. There are 5 clubs in west yorkshire, 2 in south yorkshire, 3 in cumbria and 2 in greater manchester. There is always going to be a level of competition between those clubs off the field.



Thats not to say they shouldnt do it, as i say, the question is can they make more as 1/14th of a the whole, than 100% of their own income.

You are wrong, the majority of Championship Clubs pull in very localised sponsors, at our level its love, not business sense , Leigh havent been able to get a main stand alone shirt sponsor for 3 years, instead taking a grand each from 18 individual organisations and ' raffling off ' for the main shirt sponsor



Also its 23 clubs, not 14

Would you not think that the saturation of RL clubs in that area could be a cause for this.



If you were keeping P+R certainly. But would the bigger championship clubs be happy seeing what is effectively, initially at least, a transference from them, to the clubs at the lower reaches of championship one.



Considering the attitude of some rugby league fans, can you imagine the uproar from Fev, Fax, Leigh fans etc, seeing their club effectively subsidising oxford and Gloucestershire?

No, Championship Clubs are in direct competition with SL clubs, not other Championship clubs, as I said, its love of the club, not financial return



If the geographical spread of the competition helped to bring in better, bigger, more reliable sponsorship then any club owner would be stupid to not want it, ditto the fans if it isnt properly explained to them



An open mind and communication is the key, both sadly lacking by club owners and administrators

Growth through internationals may have to go on the "back burner" for a few years.



There are 3 credible teams globally with PNG/Wales/France making up the 4 intermitently, the Aussies and Kiwis don't give a flying one now they are wedged up (SoO has got too big already,regardless of the best intentions of the new ARL statements) so better to create a TRUE SUPER league, with profitable clubs able to raise their cap, keep/attract quality players and then stand toe to toe with the other 2?



Currently, 44,000 people filling Wembley to see the the top 4 teams in the world isn't going to either inspire a generation or fund their development....but a SUPER LEAGUE comp in 10 years boasting the best players in 14 teams all with a chance of winning something has to be better than what we have now......which is essentially a 2 tier league with the bottom 8 fighting over the chance of one extra away game at the end of the season?



From a business standpoint, I would expect all Franchises to be averaging 10,000 crowds with a minimum of 2 million a year from ticketed revenue by the end of year 5 or 6 at the latest, with any club not making it cut free or the Franchise moved/sold...



2 million in tickets, 2 million in residuals, 1 million from SKY....everyone becomes self sufficient, with a 5 million Turn over, a competition atendance audience of about 100,000 a week and a far more attractive proposition to National sponsors, partners and broadcasters with an even greater opportunity for growth.

Agree with all, particularly the part in bold

The SL clubs know that they generate the revenue, and won't part with it. They told the RFL they would not fund development, hence when Sport England cut the RFL development budget, there was nothing to fill the gap. The RFU, on the other hand, now pays all its development staff in-house.



But, the RFU fills Twickers, which it owns, a dozen times a year at £60 - £200 per ticket, plus corporate/city hospitality, between internationals and finals, independent of the clubs. Despite their ineptitude, they are awash with cash. The RFL just about fills Wembley and Old Trafford, which it hires, and makes sod all on internationals cos we can't be d even to fill the LSV to watch England. In other words, we have no money save that which keeps Bratfut and Salford on the brink, and they aint parting with it.



The RFL does its level best, and at least we have a single unified governing body with the best intentions and some very committed, talneted people. Put it this way: if the RFL board ran the RFU, there would be no RL within 5 yeas. If the RFU board ran the RFL, there would be no RFL within 2 years.. We have the best bunch we can hope for while the clubs put next week's wages ahead of long term planning.

Either the RFL is the governing body of Rugby League in the UK, or Superleague teams are not under the durestiction of the RFL? Which is it?

The RFL patently receive the SKY cash (they drip fed it to Bradford last year IIRC), so in reality, the RFL either need to "man up" or at least show the clubs who's boss, or admit they have lost control and negotiate the scenario I have suggested.





Who cares..their recent "development" has been trawling through the ranks of League....





Ineptitude? Are you struggling to admit that the other code in the UK is light years ahead of League afteronly 20 years?









Under the "split" scenario, SL would fund the RFL to the tune of about 5 million a year under the current TV deal and the RFL would maintain control of the general running of the game....it's just the people responsible for handing out and monitoring the licences would be 100% removed from the game, but 100% the LAW when it comes to petulant club owners....





Please.......talented at what? The RFL should be run like a business...it currently resembles a who's who of people who interviewed well but have delivered nothing...







What?









Double what?











No...you'rejust prepared to accept second best...the RFL needs to either grab the bull by the horns or risk becoming the governing body of an amateur sport along the M62 within 10 years.....there are 10 English based Union clubs that currently generate more sponsorship money than the RFL do in a season....it's all about perspective and business sense!

If I had a $ for every numpty who predicted RL would be dead in ten years I could sponsor Sl myself!