Bateman and Gale were picked out from the get go, then they sniffed out Hodgson and Sarginson. In terms of our attack I thought it was like watching Hull under Agar. Would guess Betts has had too much to do with it.

Truth is we weren't that bad. We had all the vplay and ball in the first half hour and on another day we would have posted a couple of tries in that period and the game would have been different. We didn't but still should have taken a point from the game the game with a bit of savvy. People are talking as if we took a beating.



Its high time we got another win over the Aussies, what is it, a decade now? no better time than in two weeks. Iron a few things out, blitz Scotland and we i'm confident we will give it a good go.

I would drop Widdop not enough creativity and just passes the ball on most of the time. Bateman also, seems to enjoy the contact to make into a wrestling game not enough punch and dynamic. Lomax not got the experience at this level but I,m not sure if Ratchford would be a better replacement. For me throw Williams or Brown in at 6, running or kicking plays would increase pressure.

The Kiwis didn't just win by a drop goal. They scored three tries to two.



Only four players stood out for England: the two wingers and the two hookers.



Three tries to two. Enough said.

Every England player who doesn't play for my club side were rubbish.



Every England player from my club side stood up and played well.



I will not have any of the England players who play for my club side scapegoated either.



Oh, and if there had been several more players from my club who had been selected, England would [i'of'[/i won.



And finally... the ref was crap and favoured the Kiwis who were allowed to lie on in the tackle all game, mess about at the PTB and get away with it for 80 minutes.



Apart from that... England dominated because they have the best pack of forwards in the world.



Yep.

Widdop to full back, Williams to five eighth, Lomax to the centres. That will make a huge difference.

BTW has Paul Sculthorpe got some official position in the England set-up?

Sarginson was the worst player on the pitch by a country mile, Bateman started off ok but was soon found wanting at international level, Watkins looked too disinterested.

I think the loss of Ferres didn't help and I'd have given houghton a chance at this level

Yeah but the Johnson intercept was an absolute gift from Widdop.



Nothing in it mate, one point. Johnson the difference, fair play to him a great player and he stood up like great players do in these games. Unfortunately we don't have a game breaker close to him.

As for the thread starter, please continue to watch a game with just the one eye open.



That's what the vast majority of RL fans do.



After all, there was only one team playing this afternoon.



Anyone else care to assess the Kiwi performance player by player?



No?



Thought not.

Marks out of 10...



[uENGLAND[/u

Lomax 6

McGillvary 8

Watkins 4

Sarginson 5

Hall 6

Widdop 7

Gale 6

Hill 7

Hodgson 7

Graham 7

Bateman 6

Whitehead 6

S. Burgess 6



T. Burgess 6

G. Burgess 5

Cooper 5

Clark 5



Total = 102



[uNEW ZEALAND[/u

Kahu 7

Nightingale 6

Kata 6

Kenny-Dowall 5

Rapana 8

Leuluai 6

Johnson 8

Bromwich 6

Luke 7

Waerea-Hargreaves 5

Proctor 6

Harris 6

Taumalolo 7



Brown 6

Taupau 8

Ma'u 7

Blair 6



Total = 110

As a Saints fan id drop Lomax. There is no excuse for that attempted tackle. There are under 10s who would have completed that tackle and in offence someone needs to tell him that running in the direction of the touch judge isn't really what we need. Sarginson is another. Absolutely woeful. I don't think I've ever seen a poorer effort ever. Get him stacking shelves because he isn't a rugby league player. everyone else can at least hold their heads up bar Watkins. I know the Leeds fans think he's the best super league centre since Jamie Lyon but the reality is he is average (if that) at best as was shown today



Regards



King James