No he hasn't. I have seen enough games. Huby, Lynch, Millington lay the platform, that Clark being the excellent player he is, feeds off. Not the other way round.

[url=http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/apr/04/rfl-hull-richard-agar-refereeThis[/url was the incident in question; Richard Agar has confirmed privately that it was viewed more seriously by the RFL, because he used the same word that JP used to describe Mr Child. He was mortified that it had been interpreted as homophobic - just like the misunderstood Mr Hardaker.



JP's outburst does seem to have been brushed under the carpet, wouldn't you say?

You can take it how you want STA, fact is you're boring me to tears but that's par for the course.



Despite your best efforts to make this into something else, My point stands, the video is there for all to see and on both playing ability and being undesirable Jamie Peacock should be nowhere near the MoS award.



You can pontificate all you like now

Nothing's made up except in your head, it's there you've seen it and in whatever context Peacock used the word "bent" when shouting abuse at a gay official he was in the wrong. I thought he was supposed to be an intelligent man, if so you'd think he'd know better.



Now can you point out to me where I said you had nominated someone as MoS or did you make that up.

What a travesty that would be not to mention an insult.

Careful Fully, if you don't agree with the mob from Leeds you're deluded, fantasising, making things up and have some kind of agenda. Heaven forbid that you might voice a valid point which doesn't fit their beliefs.

Erm, in what way was it viewed as a homophobic insult. There is nothing within that that mentions the word 'bent' he wasnt suspended, he was fined. He wasnt charged with making a homophobic insult, he was charged with the offence he was punished for which was nothing to do with a homophobic insult.



So what we are apparently supposed to believe is that Richard Agar said, in an interview, James Child's performance was 100% the reason Hull lost, that his performance was "just disgraceful" and "completely ruining the game as a spectacle", but he also in the same interview said that Child was 'bent'. The RFL then secretly investigated him for for calling him 'bent', secretly punished him for it, whilst publicly investigating him for saying Childs performance was 100% the reason Hull lost, that his performance was "just disgraceful" and "completely ruining the game as a spectacle" and publicly punishing him for it, his punishment being in line with those levied against coaches for similar outbursts. But nobody at any stage reported the Agar calling Child 'Bent', nobody reported the RFL investigating it, nobody reported the RFL charging him for it, and nobody reported him being punished for it.



And it's JP's outbust being brushed under the carpet?

Hopefully it will whip you in to another hissy fit, perhaps you can make up a story about James Webster getting a secret years ban for wearing white boots, but JP's are just brushed under the carpet

You mean now you have been caught making things up......

And I've seen every game.



Therefore, I think my judgement counts a little bit more. He goes off the field and there's a visible difference. He returns and the team sparks into life, feeding off of his runs through the middle. He lifts the side.

Well you point out to me where anything has been done about Peacocks foul mouthed tirade aimed at the official in which he also used a word which a Gay official might find very insulting. It was live on TV, all over Twitter and Facebook yet nothing has been done about it even though it's at least as bad as Hardakers transgression.

Only one having a fit is you fella, Peacocks not fit to win such a prestigious award and no amount of foot stamping and holding your breath will change that.