Asked to be released from his contract early so he can sign for Leigh this season.



Discuss...

Please no



One of the few positives (God, I HATE that phrase) that has come out of today

Can't be true, a certain someone on here would have been dropping hints on here for the past week if it were true.

Good old one trick Mick

I have heard the same from a few Leigh fans, apparently Leigh want to sign him as soon as possible but they will sign him at end of season regardless, so that would explain the early release.... We have only got Clark i think this will be a shooting in the foot to be honest! But if he wants to go then id let him.

Well considering Clark is out injured, it'd be dumb if we agreed to this, that said, seeing how this season is going it'd be par for the course, also would be quite damming from higham saying he'd rather leave.

Our hooker is injured too, would love to see micky back at leigh

Quite frankly, no you can't leave Mickey. Wait till the end of the season. If we let him go we're idiots. As shown today we have no cover for hooker when either Clark/Higham can't play.

Agreed.

I know that often it's the case that players leave because if their hearts not in playing for the club then they could be a liability, but even though he frustrates me at times, he's another of those who 'set the standard' in how they train and always seems to try his very hardest.

I don't want to see him go before the end of the year.



Another experienced guy - maybe we need Gidley more than most of us know.

Just a thought... Ratch and Bridge in the halves and Myler to 9?



IMO Myler could fit in well there with a quick play of the ball

Word I'm getting is Hock in, Higham out. Possibly quite soon.

Knowing your sources I can quite believe this one, it has that smack of desperation about it. Perhaps Roger could also designate part of the stadium a reefer corner, and get it sponsored by some suitable Mexican mayor as part of the announcement ceremony ?