|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77723/777236d2890cbe8656c463e0d3232c238a511490" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 258 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2011 | Jul 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote THEOriginalWire="THEOriginalWire":dwfkhsmwBuhat does eddie know about what kit should be being worn! The rfl decided what kit should be worn, and your club were not wearing the home kit you were supposed to, cia your own choice, whether the rfl approved it or not, you rocked the boat and now dont like the water splashing in your faces.'" :dwfkhsmw
The wearing of principle kit at home is not cast in stone. The RFL can approve different options. See below for example, a sky game:
www.superleague.co.uk/video/player.php?id=21204
Here Cas, at home, are playing in their (drum roll) ....alternate kit!
i am told this was because this kit had just arrived and Cas wanted to 'promote it'. The Cas club asked the Giants if they would be kind enough to wear their principle kit for this game. The Giants kindly agreed and this was approved and confirmed by the RFL.
The Giants agreed to wearing the alternate kit to help Cas. Again I am told they did so on the proviso that the kits would be 'reversed' for the Giants home game.
The giants MD says he has the paperwork from the RFL confirming the kit option for sunday. so either
Either way the Giants acted correctly.
|
|
Quote THEOriginalWire="THEOriginalWire":dwfkhsmwBuhat does eddie know about what kit should be being worn! The rfl decided what kit should be worn, and your club were not wearing the home kit you were supposed to, cia your own choice, whether the rfl approved it or not, you rocked the boat and now dont like the water splashing in your faces.'" :dwfkhsmw
The wearing of principle kit at home is not cast in stone. The RFL can approve different options. See below for example, a sky game:
www.superleague.co.uk/video/player.php?id=21204
Here Cas, at home, are playing in their (drum roll) ....alternate kit!
i am told this was because this kit had just arrived and Cas wanted to 'promote it'. The Cas club asked the Giants if they would be kind enough to wear their principle kit for this game. The Giants kindly agreed and this was approved and confirmed by the RFL.
The Giants agreed to wearing the alternate kit to help Cas. Again I am told they did so on the proviso that the kits would be 'reversed' for the Giants home game.
The giants MD says he has the paperwork from the RFL confirming the kit option for sunday. so either
Either way the Giants acted correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2344 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2014 | Sep 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Durham Giant="Durham Giant"Who cares about shirts. I am just looking forward to taking another two points off you this season so that we can hand the hub cap to Wigan.
'"
Ofcourse - this being the absolute ideal outcome for a Hudds fan.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 19907 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Oct 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote Ceebeejames="Ceebeejames"The wearing of principle kit at home is not cast in stone. The RFL can approve different options. See below for example, a sky game:
www.superleague.co.uk/video/player.php?id=21204
Here Cas, at home, are playing in their (drum roll) ....alternate kit!
i am told this was because this kit had just arrived and Cas wanted to 'promote it'. The Cas club asked the Giants if they would be kind enough to wear their principle kit for this game. The Giants kindly agreed and this was approved and confirmed by the RFL.
The Giants agreed to wearing the alternate kit to help Cas. Again I am told they did so on the proviso that the kits would be 'reversed' for the Giants home game.
The giants MD says he has the paperwork from the RFL confirming the kit option for sunday. so either:
- The RFL failed to send the paperwork to Cas [RFL at fault
- RFL did send the correct paperwork to Cas but Cas did not read it [Cas at fault
Either way the Giants acted correctly.'"
Either way, you were misinformed. Hudds should have been wearing their home kit:
www.therfl.co.uk/~rflmedia/docs/ ... %20FEB.xls
|
|
Quote Ceebeejames="Ceebeejames"The wearing of principle kit at home is not cast in stone. The RFL can approve different options. See below for example, a sky game:
www.superleague.co.uk/video/player.php?id=21204
Here Cas, at home, are playing in their (drum roll) ....alternate kit!
i am told this was because this kit had just arrived and Cas wanted to 'promote it'. The Cas club asked the Giants if they would be kind enough to wear their principle kit for this game. The Giants kindly agreed and this was approved and confirmed by the RFL.
The Giants agreed to wearing the alternate kit to help Cas. Again I am told they did so on the proviso that the kits would be 'reversed' for the Giants home game.
The giants MD says he has the paperwork from the RFL confirming the kit option for sunday. so either:
- The RFL failed to send the paperwork to Cas [RFL at fault
- RFL did send the correct paperwork to Cas but Cas did not read it [Cas at fault
Either way the Giants acted correctly.'"
Either way, you were misinformed. Hudds should have been wearing their home kit:
www.therfl.co.uk/~rflmedia/docs/ ... %20FEB.xls
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 412 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Jan 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 258 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2011 | Jul 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Clubs are expected to act upon the official documents they receive from the RFL, such as the match officials, and not what John Ledger and the media department churn out.
For example the directive has the Giants playing Catalans on the 19th June. This was moved weeks ago to the 18th for a Sky game. Now should the Giants go with this document or the official paperwork?
|
|
Clubs are expected to act upon the official documents they receive from the RFL, such as the match officials, and not what John Ledger and the media department churn out.
For example the directive has the Giants playing Catalans on the 19th June. This was moved weeks ago to the 18th for a Sky game. Now should the Giants go with this document or the official paperwork?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 412 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Jan 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Silly mistake from the Giants,just hope they make another in the league!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 57 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2016 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 412 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Jan 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Think there just trying to cover up a big fault now and push it under the door mat.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 19907 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Oct 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Is this a conspiracy to discredit Cas or are the RFL covering their tracks for their own faux pas........
|
|
Is this a conspiracy to discredit Cas or are the RFL covering their tracks for their own faux pas........
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 412 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Jan 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote getdownmonkeyman="getdownmonkeyman"Is this a conspiracy to discredit Cas or are the RFL covering their tracks for their own faux pas........'"
Exactly my point!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 258 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2011 | Jul 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote getdownmonkeyman="getdownmonkeyman"Is this a conspiracy to discredit Cas or are the RFL covering their tracks for their own faux pas........'"
The updated web site kit directive now appears in line with the one clubs received from the RFL in [u mid May[/u. so now the fault lies with either:
- Cas (at least partly at fault for not taking both kits to an away game)
- the Cas ISP for not transfering the update
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12488 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2023 | Mar 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77723/777236d2890cbe8656c463e0d3232c238a511490" alt="" |
|