Who or what were you expecting exactly that would cause this stampede. The team have just pi$$ed the league, and the club have made a massive commitment and are making massive strides towards where they want to be - why can't you just back this !!

Squad signings who could end up being 1st team regulars, but we already have an awesome side.

To be honest, I haven't seen the 2 English lads play, and never heard of the Aussie....but I remember being chuffed with the signing of Alex Brown, and look what happened.

Welcome to the Curtis, Ben & Richard !!!!!

What do you mean "Why can't you just back this" ? I also know what the club has done.............I was there on the terrace watching them do it.



My post was in reference to these signings being a catalyst for a rush to get season tickets (hinted at by DB by the way) OK SBW or a Burges bro is just daft but none of tonights names will have any "new" species rushing to the office.........................it is ONLY this point that I commented on, as with the other matters concerning the Centurions Im happy as Larry...or Hooker

Well, looking at the footage of Curtis Johnson on you tube, it looks like Riddy will have a lot of success putting the high bomb to the left wing on the last tackle. Reminds me a lot of Pat Richards

To be fair it's the last one in Dec that Derek eluded to was a season ticket seller!

That will explain it then, with a name like Fui Fui Moi Moi you would always get the curious coming down to see who he is.

look good on the back of the shirt as well

Anyone in the RL world who hasn't heard of Fui Fui Moimoi must have had his/her head buried in the sand for 10 years.

Big names or not, these three look like great signings.



However I'm slightly confused about the Ben Reynolds contract. Why would we allow Cas the option of signing him back at the end of the season? (No I'm not being negative just asking a genuine question).

Another stupid RFL regulation concerning young players. He does not have to take up any Castleford offer if forthcoming though. So in effect it is a regulation that can not be enforced. Figure that ?

Is that the reason? That's just downright daft. So what's the RFL's thinking behind that then?

If the big clubs get rid of a player because they don't think he's good enough and then he has a storming season elsewhere, then they get to sign him back. Or am I a cynic?