I don't think he's the right man for the job, nothing against him personally............ Think that last match proved he was out of his depth as a coach, he's not that great of a coach if we're losing to Sheffeild with a half decent side.....

"Half decent side" is it now? You were claiming we had the best side in the league before.

would we have lost though, had Parker, Hoppy, Hendo and Goulden had been available, I think not.

I was just thinking that myself Tvboy with previous post by Mooke

We have best team int league, the team v Sheffeild was half decent and should of beat Sheffeild

does that clear up the confusion?

Now Now Mooka , please behave

.

ATEOTD Rowley is pretty much a novice at being first team coach, this season will have been pretty much a learning curve for him - IF he has made any mistakes then so be it, I can live with it. He and the team have exceeded my expectations this season, after all most of us were happy with a top 6 spot at the start of the season. The team deserve a lot of credit for their performances in general this season - a lot of that is down to Rowley, and I'm not one of his biggest fans by any means.

So Mookchaka of all the exsisting coaches that are available , who would you replace him with then?

Paul and team's achievements are remarkable when we consider that all season we have had a range of halfback combinations,unlike the other top teams in our division.

It'll be funny if Rowls wins the Championship Coach Of The Year award, tonight. Of course, I suppose the judges could always be accused of having no idea, too?

Think he's in with a good chance Alan, and not only us saying it some Fev fans as well.

I think Paul Rowley would be chuffed to death that only one person thinks he's the wrong man for the job. I reckon that's pretty good and doubt he'd lose any sleep over Mooke's ramblings.