Have Richard and O'carroll and Fielden played this year? If not you can hardly say they are missing, they have contributed nothing to your great start this year

If you read the report properly he states those missing 'FROM SQUAD NUMBERS 1-17 IN THE SQUAD' Do McGilvray/Patrick/Fergurson have a number 1-17 on their back, like Raleigh?



Bilko works hard on his match reports, match previews and his website jsut because he says things you do not agree with doesnt make him a 'dick' and a 'moron'

You can say they are missing. Richards and Fielden more so as they would have been starting.



Leon Pryce hasn't played this season, yet he's quite clearly missing from Saints' team.

Indeed Wadski, but I'm surprised they even include someone who they have sacked yet use it in a post to get an irrelavent point across, seems to me like they are 'buttering' the bottom of the cake tin of excuses should they lose tomorrow.

i agree with the first part the website and work that goes into is commendable and something that does credit to himself and the club but his comments about the Giants are opinion.





The comments about him being a "dick", and a "moron" are also opinion whether you agree with them or not.



Personally i would say part of his review is petty, arrogant, one eyed, biiased, innacurate and small minded. My opinion only.

Can someone explain to me why Wigan's unbeaton start to the season is supposed to be so all conquering and making Wigan the team to fear/despise in the same breath.



Started by Drawing with St Helens - Although to be fair for 70 minutes were the best team by miles - but Sts are poor this season.





Next was Bradford a big victory against a shocking side who have beaten only Wakey and Crusaders



Next was Salford - Nice win but Salford are worse than poor.



Then scraped it against Hull who have only won one this season.



So 3 wins and a draw against the lesser lights.



Next three games are Giants, Wolves and Rhino's and the Warriors have a mini injury crisis.



If anyone wants to claim that the modern side can hold a candle to the legendary exploits of the undoubtedly great Wigan team of the late eighties and early nineties they need to win these games.



Otherwise they will be in danger of being one season wonders and the arrogance shown by my fellow Wiganers will have been shown to be premature.



Roll on tomorrow, can't wait, should be a cracker. I can only see one winner (unless it's a draw

)

:2gxnkd4w



So he is a moron who puts undue emphasis on team numbers FFS. What a plodder. There are more intelligent ways to analyse a team



You believe that if you like. That's up to you.



I agree. We'd have no chance of beating Wigan this weekend if we weren't playing against them.

You'd have thought that the match referee, one of the two touch judges, one of the three disciplinary panel or one of the three appeal panel would have seen the hit by Joel Tomskin being a 'fair hit'.



It does seem strange that they ALL missed it?

Thing is, they were only there. They didn't have the benefit of seeing the video replay taken from the stands on the Super League website. That clearly showed it to be a fair hit. No, really!

ATOTD Wigan fans say it was fair so it was. EOS. Similar to the late, high shot on Robbo last season like. Fair hit, the RFL's judgement is clearly flawed the same as the views of everyone else in the world bar Wigan fans.



Black is white, night is day, the hit was fair, running in and punching someone from behind when they don't know it's coming is fair game and so on. It's clearly an anti-Wigan conspiracy if you ask me. I asked Stuart Cummins and he told me he's never liked Wigan. He thinks they smell of bins. True story.