PM with a clip sent. It proves exactly what I said... it was to the chest, nothing more.



You know, normally, someone wanting to disprove something would find the evidence themselves. You went for the flimsy defence of my "evidence wasn't good enough", but unfortunately (for you) the clip I've sent you only strengthens my case.







That's very good, hurl insults around like a big man instead of trying to win the argunment. How very grown up.







And... breathe.



Again, "soundly beaten"? That's what Castleford did to you, not what you did to Wigan. You SCRAPED a win, controversially.



You can hurl abuse, you can call me names, but you can't change facts.

i dont know about anyone else but i could get used to scraping wins against these mighty top class rugby teams. like. . . .



13/09/2009 Huddersfield 48 V 16 Wigan

or



27/03/2009 Wigan 8 V 22 Huddersfield



or even



25/07/2008 Wigan 4 V 34 Huddersfield



or what about



15/04/2007 Huddersfield 41 V 16 Wigan



yeah i'd take that, thats not to mention the "close" games we've won either ,yep im sure we could all dream of the odd scraped victory over the mighty wigan

Jeez pal, you need to think about your blood pressure. Let it go - move on.

wigan have bored everyone to death all season anyway so what there topping the table. so did saints for the past 3 years but did they win it NO they came unstuck and so will wigan its allready started and thats why there so defensive because they know there bottle is going again

Anyone else got a PM from the biased special lad?

Ah, the dangerous world of stats... So you closed the gap on us a little, 16 wins to Wigan, 8 to you in Super League... But none of that's relevant, this thread was about the Mason/Griffin incidents, someone said the O'Loughlin incident was as bad as Ablett's, and by implication from the bans handed out, as bad as Mason's trample. The obvious truth is that no, don't show so much ridiculous bias. I've proven that, and it's up to someone to prove me wrong now instead of hurling insults (like Danril and Jacko32).







Nothing wrong with my blood pressure. I moved on after the match, and if you read this thread again, the problem lies with the Huddersfield "fans" who still can't let the O'Loughlin incident go. Those are the people who need to move on.







Yes, I've had one off you. Check your sent items, see who else you've PM'ed.



Thanks for the insults, too. Getting a bit old now, how about growing up and posting something reasoned and intelligent instead?

No insults, just observations based on your posts.



You'll have to excuse me if I don't take advice on intelligent posting from you. Bit of a waste of time IMO you see, again based on what I've read from you and your supposed non-biased viewpoint!









Still here. Still posting, yet we need to move on? The survey said...

There is no justification. Someone should have brought that to the RFL's attention, unless they didn't think it was intentional. Do you have a video rather than a single selected frame because:



a) That's not good enough evidence according to Danril



b) I can't tell if there's any intent from a still image



If that was intentional then it deserved to be punished.



But in all seriousness, what did you expect me to say? Where's the evidence that O'Loughlin went high? Not got any? No, didn't think so.

I base my posts on facts. You?







It takes two (or more) to tango. You're still here too, or hadn't you noticed?

I'm here on the Huddersfield forum. I am a Huddersfield fan so that's not really surprising. You're here, a Wigan fan, parping about being unbiased and then posting total biased guff. When you manage to grasp that snippet and see that you currently are making yourself look like you're a couple of saucers short of a tea set you may then subsequently see that this also goes some way to explaining why I'm here laughing at you!

So you get the point about rolling stills of television footage out?

Time to move on now