Quote Cruncher="Cruncher"It's quite a tenuous thing, though, David.
McDermott has been linked with Wigan - by fan-chatter as far as I can see, not by anyone actually connected with the game (so not really 'linked' at all) - and you foresee a possible nightmare future where not only do Wigan get BM (because in your words it would be a typical lazy option - ?????), but Leeds get the 'slightly better' coach, David Furner.'"
So what if it is fan-chatter? I am sure there are plenty of opinions already offered on this board and others about plenty of other "candidates" who have also not as yet had some press hack put their name forward. Have you been picking up anyone who may have suggested an appointment of say Betts or Chester would not go down well? As soon as McDermott's sacking was known both Wigan Facebook groups, Mikes board and Total RL had posters saying they did not want McDermott at Wigan. Go and chase them down if you are so bothered they voiced such an opinion off their own bat.
And by the way I never used the phrase "lazy option" so they are not my words but yours, thanks. What I said was: "Now Wigan have to compete with Leeds to sign a top coach. If they end up with Furner and we end up with McDermott I think various forums and facebook groups would explode. Not because Furner is viewed as a top coach in particular but what it would say about Wigan's inability and lack of ambition to attract anyone but the unemployed!"
Quote CruncherDo you not also see a future where Shaun Edwards, Andy Farrell and Mike Ford all return to the Wigan fold as a dream ticket trio and take us to endless trophies as a result? Because there is no hard evidence that is going to happen either.'"
There is no hard evidence for any of the numerous names mentioned by fans or press getting the Wigan job, so do you not realise just how daft that sentence is? It means because "there is no hard evidence" who our next coach is no one, including you, is seemingly allowed to discuss the matter.