To achieve the top 8 you have to beat the teams immediately around you which we've managed only twice. Need to concentrate on the job in hand which is avoiding the bottom 2. Forget the top 8!

Thank goodness for the Australian imports. They certainly showed the inferior club trained players how it's done. Oh and thank goodness for Washbrook's excellent defence. It really does offset the fact he offers nothing offensively.

On that note we won the penalty count 8-3. Shows just how poor we were.

We're they kickable penalties? We could have given them a game if so?

Bentham was the only one in the ground that didn't see it and it was right in front of him. I'm confused about the 'on report', I thought it was there for if the ref was unsure what happened. How could he be unsure about that.



PS, no sour grapes, both sides got what they deserved.

We lost something we have done on many occasions with similar performances. I just want to check is this the same Mathers you wanted to be dropped and sold who you are now saying why didn't he play. I regret that some of you need to stop beating the same drum, we have a bad game, Agar out along with those considered to be at fault. If we had followed some suggestions on here I believe we would have 75% of the current squad on loan.

I guess I can find your duplicates on every clubs forum site. We are not going to win every game but pardon the cliche but the season is a marathon not a sprint.

As far as I'm concerned Mathers is our only fullback and I certainly wouldn't have dropped him. Tautau has been dynamic at LF, how Washbrook came back to that position is baffling! I just don't understand the reasoning behind experimenting against a team that I felt could be beaten. No disrespect to HKR they obviously played us off the park!

We need so me of what Powell has instilled in his Cas team, starting with sensible team selection, playing as a team - working for each other and playing for the badge on the shirt!

That's great - so once again, the team that you play next will reap the benefit.



Refereeing this season is as bad as I can remember it in the SL era; neither side were square at the ptb all afternoon and the 10 metres was very much a moveable feast.



Very poor indeed.

No sour grapes in regards HKR winning the game, they were the better team by some margin. I'm baffled and disappointed in my teams lack of effort and it's coaches selections which defy logic.



The ref is a different issue, h was just crap, crap for teams. As has been said he marked a poor 10 and didn't really police it, he allowed both teams markers not to stand square, Wakefield won the penalty count but the on report system means we get no benefit from Burns upcoming ban, while HKR benefited from a number f 50/50 decisions and an amazing amount of 'back to one' on the tackle counts.

We could have had any Ref today and the result would be the same no fight no heart.We never got into the KR players faces and just stood and watched them and then when we had the ball never drove it in with enough effort.Agar baffles me at times and I cant understand why (his words) experiment.The only experiment I would have made and that's to rest Kirmond the lad looked out on his feet and needs a rest before the long term effect is his playing days are over.I would ask a question that a lady sat behind us asked "after playing like we did against Saints where does a performance like that come from" yes saints were down on strength but they were even more under strength when they beat Leeds.

Captain struggling, VC dropped, not good for leadership or structure.