Quote jonh="jonh"Losing Eastmond, Tomkins and it seems Sam Tomkins is a tragedy for the game.
It sends a message that any young League player with a bit of talent can only aim towards union. We will become a feeder code.
The international pool of players available to our code is tiny, there are 3 who will walk away and leave us so much weaker. Until we get a credible International comp then our code will always struggle.
I am all for the salary cap, but I think clubs should be allowed to protect home grown products and exceptions made for Academy products, as long as a club can prove they are able to support this without getting into financial dificulty.'"
The levels that RU clubs are able to pay would mean that RL would effectively have to scrap the salary cap.
That shouldn't happen, so unfortunately Wigan will have to work round it as best they can.
RL becoming a feeder code to RU is IMO scare tactics by wigan/wigan fans who wish for there club to be treat differently, or for them to manouver (at least) the salary cap higher, this would turn other clubs into feeder clubs for the larger clubs (such as wigan), even more so than now, and that is why it shouldn't be allowed as it isn't in the best interest of SL or RL in general.
Unfortunately when you have two strains of a similar game, the highest paid will attract the better or greedier players, wether that ultimately does that game any long term good is open to debate.
Being a fan of a smaller club unable to keep its best players, and i'm sure other clubs are in a similar and worse situation, i have little sympathy for wigan.
Its market forces and the real world, unfortunately it will lessen our chances of national team strength, but that nothing in comparison to the damage the rfl have done at that level, so they ought not to cry wolf either.