Personally thought Gleeson was better.

Another 1 I agree with u. Gleeson offered more and had more to his game than senior that said I think either 1 of them would be a big gamble for us. Whether either would be worth it though is another question.

I'm with Mr. Fox

You are Adam Werritty and i claim my £5 in expenses!!

Senior its a bad injury though where as Gleeson hasnt been anything like for 2 plus years personally i think Gleeson as shot it and needs help desperatly.

Let the whino`s have him on his pay if you play & if he looks good 1/2 way through the season then offer him a short term contract.

I'd leave keith to play for whino's, lots of players coming back from bad knee injuries at his age dont come back to the same standard as their body cant hack it

I would have Keith Senior here any day, not just for his playing but for the wealth of experiance he would pass on to our younger players.

Always agree with Mr Fox pity we don't see him round Horbury now

He's describing Senior from a few seasons ago; the current Senior is, sadly, crocked. I'm not a terrific fan of him as a person, but it can't be denied that he's been an outstanding player throughout the SL era - he was such a good centre, that he fooled everyone into believing that Ryan Hall was a world class winger!

big powerful and stupid. he'll have lost his leg drive and pace, and probably be even more stupid. look at the last two months or so:



1. sign for wrexham

2. state you want to stay in yorkshire



make your mind up.

Agree.



Senior's injury is a shocker as well, takes younger players a good couple of years to recover from, can't see him getting over it, in the time he has left. Could probably still do a job in SL but with 3 years security short termism is not the policy I would be going for if I were trinity especially given it is such a risky short term fix.