How?

To be fair, he was probably referring to the CCRC.

He really should learn to keep his gob shut about things he clearly knows the square root of knack all about.

And having looked at the 'evidence' do you think it was right for him to have an appeal rejected or where those involved in making that decision swayed by all the media whores and other righteous souls..

Why can SB not have an opinion, and what gives you the power/knowledge to say he is wrong? You are BTW, but that's my opinion and you seemingly know the cube root of even less than SB..power to you good Sir, very brazen to come onto an open forum & show yourself up to be even less intelligent than the person you're attacking..kudos to you

What "evidence" has Bruce or you looked at then?



Did you both attend the whole trial and listen to every word of testimony or have you read a complete transcript of the case?



The appeal judge at least read the grounds for appeal and when compared to the trial transcript, decided not to allow the appeal. A decision that was then confirmed by a panel of threee appeal court judges.



Much of the game of professional soccer is still steeped in misogyny, it's high time they dragged themselves into the 21st century

He's entitled to his opinion but it was unwise of Bruce to publicly comment on this.

Bruce has done right in speaking out against the media witch hunt. If people knew 'the facts' of the case they might see things a little differently https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-che ... dwyn-evans Now watch this video and tell how wasted she is chedevans.com/judge-for-yourself

Bruce has done right in speaking out against the media witch hunt. If people knew 'the facts' of the case they might see things a little differently https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-che ... dwyn-evans Now watch this video and tell how wasted she is chedevans.com/judge-for-yourself

Probably about right.



Those rightly demanding free speech for the likes of Paris cartoonists would do well to allow the same right to those who may not agree with mainstream opinion.

I don't paticularly care whether he's guilty or not, any person should be allowed to continue their career once they've served their sentence. The fact he's a footballer shouldn't come in to the equation.



However I do find it bizarre that, given the girls story they could find one party guilty and the other not guilty.

Quote Sebasteeno="Sebasteeno"Bruce has done right in speaking out against the media witch hunt. If people knew 'the facts' of the case they might see things a little differently https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-che ... dwyn-evans Now watch this video and tell how wasted she is chedevans.com/judge-for-yourself'" It is not a Media witch hunt mate unless you are thinking that approx. 40000 are media people. The fact is the girl had never met this scrote and was she was drunk he sneeked in and out of a Hotel and not only penetrated her but had a bit of Muff diving. If you and Bruce want to defend that well good for you. I hope you never have a problem with a daughter.

Quote Sebasteeno="Sebasteeno"Bruce has done right in speaking out against the media witch hunt. If people knew 'the facts' of the case they might see things a little differently https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-che ... dwyn-evans Now watch this video and tell how wasted she is chedevans.com/judge-for-yourself'" It is not a Media witch hunt mate unless you are thinking that approx. 40000 are media people. The fact is the girl had never met this scrote and was she was drunk he sneeked in and out of a Hotel and not only penetrated her but had a bit of Muff diving. If you and Bruce want to defend that well good for you. I hope you never have a problem with a daughter.

1885, does that mean if your children went to a nursery and one of the staff got convicted of being a paedophile you'd be happy for them to resume looking after your children once they'd served their sentance?

That's illegal. Evans playing football again isn't illegal.