I say its time the fans petition the RFL to change the review system as it clearly the absolute opposite of everything their statement suggests.



Or we could just storm Red Hall with pitchforks an flaming torches.

Second one sounds more fun

And the most productive option.

I had seen and heard about this over the weekend and Monday but was hoping Agar had just got his wires crossed, obviously not! That man should have been kicked out of the game many years ago(not Agar by the way lol)! The judiciary to match officials needs a complete overhaul but I wouldn't have a clue where to start, it's a complete shambles. A good start would be the dropping of Ganson from a great height.



I stopped attending away games last year due to the whole system!

How could they not decide who to ban on the Whiting tackle anyway? The Widnes number 16 clearly places his hands between Whiting's legs and tips him over into a vertical position. It looks quite clear cut to me.

@RugbyDiscipline

They seem to have the right idea.

.................It took 3 pages before I realised it was a joke

I am in complete agreement with all I have seen today including Hudgell but is it not time for some of these Thick Headed players to stop some of the daft things they are doing. Before the game starts the players should perhaps say to refs right we will not go in 3rd man as long as you shout held quicker. The shoulder charge is outlawed - don't do it. And by the way get everybody (both teams) on side so that the game can be played properly. Remember Refs we introduced sin binning many years ago - start using it we the fans wont mind.

For me Johnson (10) should have been charged, he could see the leg being lifted by 16 yet he executes the throw.



Poore does lift the legs with hand inside, but 3 games for that is ridiculous

can anybody tell me how blake solly and his muppets get to be in charge of rugby league,are they voted on?if so, by whom?????

And yet when there are a couple of referees sat in the video box watching punches , high tackles , players being stood on etc the RFL say that they are not allowed to intervene because it's up to the on field referee and it wouldn't be fair as video refs aren't at every game. I know SG think's he's omniscient but the RFL should be ensuring that as he isn't and can't be at every game he butt's out until he does his weekly review. Inconsistency at every bl00dy level!!

I loved the line 'What he's said is irrelevant.'

Erm sorry Jon but it isn't at all.



It's these kind of actions and comments that make it look like a secret society.