I don't go on Wiki.

It is pointless.

Like I have said to you mate Dum Dum if I admit my mistakes (remember falling off your chair earlier?) then why not just admit it and move on?

Possibly because I was being a tad naughty (You and Dum Dum know how that works right?) and poking fun at the club being a bit vague in their discription of said injury.

That is true but that is hardly the point is it.

You wrongly assumed what I meant though.

Like I said it's not my fault that the club were vague in the discription of said injury leaving it open to interpritation for those who didn't know it was the groin abductor he had strained.

Haha, so now you're so clued up on muscle groups (prior to tonight) that you can post hidden jokes that only a like minded biology genius would be able to chuckle at.



I bow to your outstanding mind, you are "The Man".

I'd quite confidently say that a good 99.9% of people, if told that Withers had strained his abductor on Sunday, would guess that it was his groin, not only for the fact that this is probably the easiest to strain, but because it's common in RL and other running sports.



Now that you've explained your joke, I don't think it was very funny and has only succeeded in making you look like a fool, no, a backtracking fool. Like General Zod but worse.

Not really it is just that a while ago I severly brused my buttocks and saw the word used by the doc and was sure It was the same word as for the groin as I had torn that whilst playing years ago.

Being the type of fella I am (I go nuts if I think I know something and need to be certain) I straight away went home and looked it up on the interweb (On my laptop cause I couldn't sit down at the time.



As an example If I watch a film, TV program or something else and I think I know an actor but i'm not certain I go nuts until I look on IMDB to check.

Belive what you want it won't make you any more right but at least you may feel better.



Also you mentioning poor jokes.

I guess you were going for irony again.

No, there is no joke there, just fact - Hence the lack of winking smilie.

Nope see you are wrongly assuming again.

I wasn't saying that you were joking in that last post.

Is the back track complete now?



Good, maybe we can get back on topic now.



I've never actually met nor do I know dum-dum, seeing as you're not a fan of Wikipedia, why not have a look on OED at what "mate" means.



After the last, what is it, six, seven pages, I'm assuming we can now just talk about any old rubbish on any thread as long as it satisfies our ego.

Well no, you didn't stipulate, as a stickler for such - why didn't you? Poor that.

I admit i'm wrong when I am.

I defend myself when some wrongly assumes something about me.

I fail to see how you can't understand that.

But yeah by all means let us get back on topic.



So it must have been one damn small groin strain if he is back already.

We're back to, "I'm misunderstood". I'm not prepared to go further with this until all your posts come with this. www.plainenglish.co.uk/crystal-mark.html

We're back to, "I'm misunderstood". I'm not prepared to go further with this until all your posts come with this. www.plainenglish.co.uk/crystal-mark.html