That would make them the same, not better.



Anyway, we managed to hold onto the ball once or twice on Friday

Great reply







Go on then show me how far you trawled back.....



Law of [uaverages [/usuggests you'll find the odd spelling error in my posts.....oh wait a minute you don't understand averages, mathematics, maths, math (US term)

The Law of averages says AS has posted 10 times more than you have, so that suggests you will find the odd spelling error in his posts, yet you pick up on one whilst admitting to making them yourself.



Law of averages suggest you will make an idiot of yourself in 9 out of 10 of your posts.

Whoosh...Aimed at roversmad and his mental arithmetic (or lack of)

Didn't have to trawl back anywhere. It's in your username.

I hope your 2nd prediction is equally as good as your first

Technically, his second prediction was that you'd lose to Wigan. You just about scraped a win against their kids who Frankie didn't realise would be playing.



The outstanding prediction is his first, that hull will lose to Saints. It should be a good game with the incentive of the loser going to France.

Lets hope his outstanding prediction is as accurate as the first one (chronologically) Clearly if he had had a bet on the afforementioned predictions, he would not be sat there waiting to find out the result of Hull vs Saints to see if he had won eh? Stop being such a braindead rovers fan stereotype.

Or even the incentive of playing the Frogs at home if they don't beat Warrington, thus avoiding the need to play your under 15's (assuming you pick up 20 more injuries against Larndon)

You think Wire will travel to France this week with a strong squad?

They would be stupid if they did tbh

It's easy to predict after the result if I had known at the time you were playing Wigan under 19s I wouldn't have said that because when the teams were announced I had a bet on Hull minus 4 and Torres fist goal as a double and as for the saints game who knows now