Would you go? www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 5950712612

Would you go? www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 5950712612

I'd definitely go, without question.



Hope this happens.

Absolutely-Bloody-Lutely.

Few comments in there regarding London and the Brocos that will disturb the parochial northerners

Fo' sho' blud!!

Sold!

In the words of Kevin Keegan, I would absolutely bloody love it !

Certainly SOO would be a far bigger draw than one of the weekly rounds.



This would be a fantastic game to have over here

Origin at Wembley needs to be on the BBC on a Saturday.



If it was played at noon Saturday London time in May, June or July that would be 9 pm Saturday night in most of Australia. Channel 9 would probably accept that.



I think that the British attendance and TV audience would be improved if it was held at 1 pm London time, but that would mean 10 pm in Sydney and that later hour would eat away at some of the TV audience in Australia.

Definately.

Is it just Me or do others think that article shows utter disregard for the British game? Just who do the Aussies think they are? Why are they discussing our game with soccer bosses or anyone else other than the RFL. I Love origin & the NRL & subscribe to premier sports to get my fill, But super league is our top competition & nothing should be allowed to distract from that. If they are convinced that games at Wembly are the way to go then let the NRL clubs promote & support a proper & meaningfull international series every year (like union) six or seven games in a propper gap in the NRL/super league programe. That is something up to now they have have fought against. I just sounds like a money making scheme for the NRL clubs. If we are to fill wembley for rugby league games then it should be the RFL or RLIF getting that money not the NRL clubs. Just sheer arogance to describe their competition as the highest standard. International sport is the highest standard nothing else comes close.

Surely it is upto the Australian game where they host one of their games, and nothing to do with the RFL or Super League?



The biggest question for me is, why does it take the incoming NRL chief to kick off these discussions with "UK soccer bosses"? Why have the Super League clubs not been doing this? What has Nigel Wood been doing?



Recently there was a conference in Australia for all the NRL clubs to discuss ways of improving membership numbers, with guest speakers from across the World of sport. What have Super League clubs been doing?



Whilst Super League and the RFL are bickering about the number of teams and how to structure the leagues, the Australian game is storming further and further ahead, both on and off the field.

Surely, it would make sense to concentrate on improving the international game first. Twickenham has multiple home games each year built up over many years. Glad they are chatting with the RFU as they hold the expertise and experience in promoting and marketing big events.

Sure a state of Origin game here would be brilliant in time (preferebly at a more inner London venue,) but not before annual internationals take place in London and around the UK mid-season!!

But money talks and any Rugby League of this magnitude in London could be used hopefully to benefit the beleaguered London Broncos in some way.

But reading the report there are some assumptions, artistic licence and conjecture being applied to the article, over to you Australia!!